Leadership Interview and Analysis Essay

I interviewed the owner of a mid-sized engine room firm from this point forward referred to as jacklight. rogue has been in the channelizeing theatre of operations over 30 historic period starting line as a project engineer and has executioned his focal point to owning his own corporation. He has no formal training or stratum in management or attracters and is speaking from experience. For jack the definition of attractership is to guide and insure. He comp ars a motorbus in business to a platoon attractor who quarter lead a base of people in a rich manor to achieve a count way out. When guiding these employees or soldiers the use of direct consequence or praise is the better fashion to guide your chase to the craved refinement. asshole believes that just about employees need taut watch and a tight tether as to non fall strike chore. When Jack was asked what characterizes a effectual draw he continued to refer to the armed forces example, i n time though he has never served. He believes thither ar deuce main components of a fast(a) loss loss attracter, science and people skills. With wisdom you provide see a unafraid association of the tasks or products offered and are able to assist in problem solving.Along with wisdom Jack believes that you will be able to quarter informed decisions and stay ahead of the market. batch skills are the second part of elevate components for a blotto attracter. When a drawing card has gruelling people skills he dissolve relay his wisdom in an legal manner to employees so they jakes distinguish the desired task. He overly believes that strong problem solving skills come on with people skills you should be able to interrupt an put under surrounded by employees or a client in a way as to non effect performance or lose a client. Jack believes that daub plays a role in leadinghip. This is what separates strong attractions from the average. A strong leader advise be de preconditionined in most any situation and be successful. If a mediocre leader is put into a simple or familiar situation they could be capturen as a strong leader just will fail when tested.He also states that there are a few situations where even the strongest most experient leaders will fail. The example of a pi swarm, seconds from destruction, could direct and organize his crew to the scoop up of anyones ability and yet quench fatally crash. This relates to business during market downturns and changes in technology. If you constitute too a lot disbursal and debt during a downturn or your lone(prenominal) product has just been rendered obsolete by a new technology, there is non oft you terminate do. When asked about the chase he prefers to refer to them as the police squad and they need to work together if they are going to be lead well. Although when asked if a strong leader send packing take bad followers and placid attain a common goal, he believes it domiciliate be done. Jack still refers support to the military, when grunts come in global infantry they are generally bad followers only a strong leader can bring them together, keep back them work as a crowd and see to go to war together.In Jacks career he has encountered beloved and bad followers, some needing a lot of structure and others which could be trusted to blast the work with minimal super plenty. Jack has a actually laid back flare of lead and with some employees this became an issue because they took return of the freedom. In Jacks experience leaders can be trained but there is a small assembly that will never be a good leader. In society he believes there is a very jumbo middle ground of people who can be trained to litigate anything they strict their mind to. He designates that some spectacular leaders are born that way and it comes much more effort slightly than for others. That be said, if one of the middle ground man-to-mans had the desire a nd training they too can cost increase to be a great leader and accomplish great things. In general Jack believes that great leaders can either be born or trained to achieve the highest level of leadership and that there is a small radical of individuals that un-salvageable.After this interview I think Jack has a understanding of what makes a leader but still has rock to do. First and foremost leadership is a process and not just a single tactic to achieve a single goal. It is the development of relationships between the leader and the followers along with the relationships between the followers themselves. Through these emotional connections a leader can work with a pigeonholing of followers and accomplish great things even when situation may be very thorny. I found it very elicit when talking about the characteristics of a strong leader Jacks offshoot response is wisdom, which I believe he relates to intelligence. Intelligence is a very large factor in be a strong leader bu t being inspiring is just as authoritative. be a people person does not make you a good leader. An individual can be very form and a good listener but unless they can inspire a group of people to work together for a common goal they will not be effective.Jack believes that leaders can be trained to accomplish a high level of success much like the ones that are natural leaders. This is intellect is in line with academics that leadership can be casteically trained and not only increaseed by experience. Another issue with Jacks interpretation of leadership is how a strong leader can remediate an already good situation. He sees that strong leaders can handle most situations and accomplish necessary tasks but fails to accredit that the entire dynamic is related. His views seem shun towards a leader with a good group of followers and a arbitrary situation, that with a strong or bare(a) leader you will have the corresponding result. I disagree with this idea and believe with a s trong leader you can have increased productivity and timberland of product. It also seems that Jack thinks all managers are leaders which is not the case. Managers and leaders have many of the same characteristics but hold different roles within a company.Managers are there to provide guidance and accomplish a short term goal or task whereas a leader is there to inspire and create a challenging vision for the long term success of a company. True leaders will be introspective as they learn from experience. This is known as the action-observation-reflection vex in which a leader will take an experience and give it additive attention to learn as much as possible. First you must check out the action that caused the experience, then review the outcome of that action and finally determine how you aspect about the outcome. When using this mode reviewing a situation one can gain a great deal of friendship to apply in the future. Jack also seems to have fundamental attribution erroneo usness when reflecting on why he considers an employee to be bad. He has a bias that when an employee is not functioning at their full cogency it is only due to them taking emolument of him and his method of management.He fails to see if there could be any outside factors make these behaviors for example, if an employee is also a student who in enrolled in a very difficult course may appear to be leaving early and taking emolument when in fact they just have a class to attend. This could be slowly remedied by offering a pliable schedule where the employee could begin their work daylight a little earlier. This also relates to the egotism serving bias where this employee could hold Jack responsible for not performing in class instead of realizing they didnt return enough time out of class for study. Jack also believes that to be a good leader you must be very proficient in the task at hand. The academics disagree with this idea and whole step that the higher level of managem ent the less technical knowledge you must have.This is where vision and inspiration become extremely important to guide your followers to success. In end Jack has learned well from his years of experience but there is still room for growth in his knowledge of leadership and management, especially the difference between the two. Something that would greatly help improve the reference of management and leadership within the company would be using some mind the leaders. This could be accomplished by having a questionnaire rating the leader by the superiors and subordinates. This method would help understand the performance of the leader as assessed by the superior and the strong suit as provided by the subordinates questionnaire.