Movie City Hall Review Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

City Hall - Movie Review Example perhaps the most famed policy-making leader, when it comes to idealism of purpose, was Cincinnatus. Long before the days when Rome was a distributed empire, it was a republic clinging to the underbelly of what would be Western Europe. When the Aequi and Volscian tribes began to threaten Rome from the east in 458 B.C., the citizens begged Cincinnatus to see over dictatorial billets and vanquish the threat. He did so, in a mere sixteen days, and then without delay resigned his position of power, returning to his farm. This example of knowing when to yield power was cited by George Washington, after he stepped subject after two terms as the first President of the United States (Cincinnatus).City Hall, directed by Harold Becker, is just one of a long line of works in American literature and movie theater that analyze the slow erosion of an idealistic leaders credibility. One of the first works on this theme was Robert Penn Warrens all in all the K ings Men, a scantily fictionalized look at the life of Louisianas Huey Long. Willie Stark, who is Penn Warrens slightly larger-than-life Huey Long figure, and John Pappas, in the buff Yorks mayor in City Hall, are two men who confine risen to their current power using a similar dichotomy of private and public positioning outwardly, both men name ridden a populist wave of sentiment to their current posts inwardly, both men have incurred debts to the corrupt powers that fit much of politics, and both ultimately have a price to pay. two men are well-nigh followed by idealistic staffers - Willie Stark is followed by the aptly named Jack Burden, bandage John Pappas is followed by Kevin Calhoun. Both of these men have bought into the message that their respective leaders have broadcast to the masses, and both men fervently believe in the men for whom they work. By the end of both stories, both men are disenchant as to the true nature, and the true source, of political power.The con tradictions that revolve around political power primarily have to do with the definition and application of duty. The existence of a duty triangle has been asserted, in that, over time, common chord major approaches to classifying honourable thought have arisen, and these approaches are based on virtue, principle, or consequences. In other(a) words, people put forward their ethical decisions based on one (or more) of these three ideas. When one considers political leaders, it would be difficult to leave both virtue and principle out of the equation after all, the lower rungs of political service are not sufficiently lucrative for a purely utilitarian individual to pass off the situation attractive. There has to be some idealistic motive behind entry into public service, blush if, after time, that idealism is worn away and replaced by a jaded faade. The idea of virtue finds definitions for ethical conduct in the behaviors and qualities of the good individual. The idea of princi ple suggests that universal principles can be used to make ethical decisions. These two are very similar however, the key difference is that the virtue-based definition uses individuals as its orientation, while the principle-based definition uses a broader base of precedent as its orientation. The idea of consequences looks at the outcomes of actions and uses those outcomes to determine whether or not an action is right or wrong - this is often called a utilitarian